tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-296476092024-03-19T11:01:58.334+00:00Enterprise Communication InsightEnterprise Communicationhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02547627175373040405noreply@blogger.comBlogger103125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29647609.post-65636128975469929542009-01-05T20:06:00.000+00:002009-01-13T22:36:27.376+00:00Why does the antenna fail?Maybe its the device that I was given. But after using it for several months (less than a year), I have been noticing that my Blackberry curve is failing to keep its antenna active. It searches for network in places where it always found network. Did the T-mobile guys reduce the number of towers they supported in London.<br /><br />Over the span of my use of the blackberry curve, I have noticed that the software can throw some problems at times. For instance, the Gtalk software installed on my Blackberry Curve throws exception errors so frequently that I have stopped using it.<br /><br />Saying so, I must admit that RIM's devices still lead the pack in terms of business use. They have clearly thought it out. The idea of an e-mail centric mobile phone is just awesome. I remember the last time I spoke with a reporter from FT on smartphones, she said there was broader agreement that Blackberry is the de-facto choice. However, from my experience it seems that there is still some work to be done.Enterprise Communicationhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02547627175373040405noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29647609.post-52832758800315070172008-12-22T07:36:00.000+00:002009-01-14T07:43:28.770+00:00My blackberry is giving me the jittersGuys, have you faced continuity issues with Blackberry. Mine is 15 months old and it is giving me some problems.<br /><br />1. The antenna doesn't work properly. It continuously searches for network in places where it didn't previously<br />2. The 'saved messages' folder seems to have lost a number of messages. For instance, a whole set of messages between certain dates have gone missing.<br />3. The IM chat sessions take ages to open these days. I haven't changed location nor have I changed what I used to do previously<br />4. The button that on pressing displays "Entering stand-by mode........" doesn't function all the time.<br />5. The call quality has deteriorated. The sound fidelity seems to have gone down.<br /><br />Let me know if any of you guys are facing similar problems.Enterprise Communicationhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02547627175373040405noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29647609.post-47223603028368795642008-12-15T14:23:00.000+00:002009-01-13T23:38:17.879+00:00How is open source faring?In the beginning of the year, I supervised a colleague's work on open source. I found that the movements in that space fascinating. Towards the end of the year, I wonder how have they performed in 2008 especially because-<br /><br />a) a number of these companies have been start-ups. A large number of them are SI/VARs etc. How are they managing their working capital in a slowdown<br />b) How are they raising capital needed to bid for large projects where the client wants to reduce TCO? Are they displacing the big guys in a small number of deals in the SMB space?<br /><br />In search of answers, I dig into the websites of some of these companies:<br /><br />1. Fonality led by Chris Lyman seems to doing well. It launched some firmware for mobile and Google integration in September and went on to announce a relationship with salesforce.com last week.<br />2. Pingtel: I am not sure if I can mention but I had written something about in the report in relation to PingTel (or maybe I had not written!). As the case maybe, Nortel went on to acquire PingTel. I am not surprised.....great news for SIPfoundry guys.<br /><a href="http://www.os-voip.com/2008/08/nortel-buys-open-source-ip-pbx-company-pingtel/">http://www.os-voip.com/2008/08/nortel-buys-open-source-ip-pbx-company-pingtel/</a><br />3. Digium: They got a new headquarter. Tom Keating snapped it all up. Follow the link-<br /><a href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/asterisk/digium-headquarters-tour.asp">http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/asterisk/digium-headquarters-tour.asp</a><br />Their battle with sipXecs seems to continue. It appears that Pingtel managed to get one up on them by becoming a part of Nortel.<br /> <br />Who else? There are a number of great players in the market from the large vendors who OEM open-source to small ones like ADDIX, ESCAUX, and Novacom. I wish there was an opportunity to connect and get to know how they have been doing.Enterprise Communicationhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02547627175373040405noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29647609.post-88176702451645378702008-12-07T10:16:00.000+00:002009-01-13T22:53:19.517+00:00iPhone vs Blackberry: Consumer vs CorporateSomebody asked me who will win the smartphone war- iPhone or Blackberry. I said, "depends on the turf". Blackberry is a robust, reliable e-mail centric smartphone that can handle voice, multimedia and entertainment (the new versions are better at it). Its primary place of use is in business. iPhone is a awesome looking media and entertainment device that can also communicate.<br /><br />Can blackberry fight iPhone in the consumer space? Not today at least!<br />Can iPhone win against Blackberry in the corporate space? No!<br /><br />However, recent efforts by Blackberry to emulate the iPhone is distressing. I have had only a brief look at the Storm (don't get invited to those parties anymore ever since I changed my job). I will have to say that I wasn't impressed. I wonder where does RIM want to position the storm? In the corporate space?! But typing is such a problem with Storm. I wish I was in the centre of action to know more of these stuff.Enterprise Communicationhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02547627175373040405noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29647609.post-77306740827555562962008-11-23T01:45:00.000+00:002009-01-14T02:05:40.097+00:00Why doesn't Blackberry promote VoIPBlackberry is the most preferred smartphone in the world. And VoIP is what every aware user wishes to use. Most enterprises use VoIP and most of the voice traffic internationally is IP based. I wish Blackberry would promote more of VoIP. Despite acquiring Ascendant in 2006, we don't hear or read much of Blackberry's VoIP capability that can help users bypass the mobile voice bill-rates. Is it pressure from carriers?<br /><br />In an article, Nadeem Unuth gives us ways to make use of VoIP on Blackberry. For the complete article, refer to the following link:<br /><a href="http://voip.about.com/od/mobilevoip/a/BlackBerryVoIP.htm">http://voip.about.com/od/mobilevoip/a/BlackBerryVoIP.htm</a><br /><br />I am taking the liberty to reproduce some of what he wrote:<br /><br />1. Truphone: Using the web a user can be called and then call the destination. Both the calls (to the originator as well as the called party) originate with Truphone which uses VoIP.<br />2. VoIP Softphone applications like Yeigo: This application can be installed on blackberry (need to verify!). Voice calls can be made using Blackberry's data plan.<br />3. Blackberry WLAN solution (Blackberry 7270 handheld)<br /><br />However that being said, I haven't tried any of these. I know that some of my colleagues have tried to install some applications on mobile phones. Its high time I get in touch with them......Enterprise Communicationhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02547627175373040405noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29647609.post-75422786157726932282008-10-24T11:30:00.001+00:002009-01-14T02:31:27.166+00:00Interview with Richard Barrington of Sun MicrosystemsEnterprise Communicationhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02547627175373040405noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29647609.post-50210651648602802112008-10-10T11:54:00.000+00:002009-01-14T07:35:10.976+00:00Blackberry in Enterprise 2.0The debate on which is the central application- e-mail or phone-is long over. Studies conducted by various Industry Analyst and market research houses suggest a growing tilt towards e-mail. Most users check their e-mail the first when they get to work and more often than phone. Blackberry took this ability one degree further. It enabled workforce to check their e-mail anywhere, anytime. But in the process it did something else too! It crossed the office boundary and entered the personal space. How often have you checked your Blackberry outside office hours?<br /><br />Enterprise 2.0 aims to bring personal applications into workplace. It aims to tap into the productivity enhancing capabilities of personal applications such as IM, collaboration type software etc. For example, how can we forget Mayo's Hawthrone experiments that every HR manager learns in MBA school. There is definitely a need for a facebook like application at work as much as their is a need for a cafeteria. But I digress....... While enterprise 2.0 aims to bring consumer grade producticity enhancing applications into corporate world, Blackberry did just the opposite. It took a corporate application into our personal space. Being a user of Blackberry Curve, I must tell you that this transition has been smooth. I use Blackberry wherever I want whenever I want. Is this the beginning of the great blur between corporate and personal spaces?Enterprise Communicationhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02547627175373040405noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29647609.post-951565623381115592008-09-20T07:44:00.000+00:002009-01-14T07:50:04.670+00:00Barrack Obama uses BlackberryBarrack Obama uses Blackberry. Not sure which model he carries. This is a great coup for RIM folks. And they richly deserve it. Given the circumstances they have been, with all the lawsuits and other things......RIM deserves better.<br /><br />Barrack Obama using Blackberry has a problem. If he wins the primaries and goes on to win the elections and becomes the President of the U.S.A, he will probably need to forgo the device. Such a pity! It appears that Western governments such as France and the U.S.A discourage the use of Blackberry amongst senior level executives.<br /><br />Maybe RIM can address their security and data protection concerns. Just a thought!Enterprise Communicationhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02547627175373040405noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29647609.post-49631486740365480832008-08-17T07:50:00.000+00:002009-01-14T07:58:41.382+00:00Mobile Unified Communications in Blackberry?Having been using Blackberry for a year, I want more. I wish that there was an update that could push my voice-mails as e-mails. I wish I could use VoIP data bits and bypass the mobile voice toll. I wish Blackberry improved the conferencing capabilities or at least partnered with someone. I remember communicating with the CTO of Genesys Conferencing earlier in the year when he said that there are plans to put their application on Blackberry. And I wish as a user I am told of these things happening.<br /><br />Blackberry in my view is well positioned to become the central device driving mobile UC. However, given their size of business and the value chain entities they cover, it might be a difficult proposition for industry players to partner. Blackberry will have to open up more and support open standards or at least contibute to its development. Because you know what.......mobile UC is pointless without Blackberry as much as users would love to do more with their BlackberryEnterprise Communicationhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02547627175373040405noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29647609.post-83199190625161143072008-08-10T20:10:00.002+00:002008-08-10T20:32:56.090+00:00I'm back!I haven't been blogging actively this year for several reasons. For one, during the major part in the first half of the year, I had been excessively busy with consultative assignments. And in May, I changed jobs. After I left Frost & Sullivan, I decided not to post anything related to enterprise communication for at least three months.<br /><br />In the last three months, I have seen the industry move ahead. "Unified Communication" is moving from a positioning exercise to become a part of the thought process. "Enterprise Mobility" is gaining greater awareness at least in Europe. In the press articles, U.S. consultants appear to be fighting the war of words on whether to let 'enterprise mobility' be a part of UC. Also, Collaboration of different form factors is gaining traction.<br /><br />All talk of climate change has placed strong emphasis amongst enterprises to do their bit on preventing carbon emissions. I notice growing consciousness amongst employees, families and of course at the social level. Executives are beginning to ask the question-"Do I need to travel to do this meeting.......". I am sure some of them are facing questions from their wives and kids. Video-conferencing, tele-conferencing and other forms of collaboration are becoming 'preferred' albeit slowly. It is a difficult choice today. While on one hand you have the consciousness of 'climate change', on another you have the effectiveness of a face-to-face discussion. What is needed is a whole new set of benchmarks to let the story of video-conferencing and collaboration hit mainstream consciousness.Enterprise Communicationhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02547627175373040405noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29647609.post-5218594130001172852008-06-02T02:28:00.000+00:002009-01-14T02:29:16.888+00:00Interview with Timothy Marsden of HPEnterprise Communicationhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02547627175373040405noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29647609.post-24059467348537010012008-04-30T16:31:00.000+00:002009-01-13T23:42:47.035+00:00Open Source in Europe. How much did you know?Frost & Sullivan conducted extensive research on the open source market in Europe. I have reproduced the executive summary out here. For details on the complete report and how you can buy, please contact <a href="mailto:nils.frenkel@frost.com">nils.frenkel@frost.com</a><br /><br />Open Source telephony has come a long way since starting as a collaborative project amongst tech enthusiasts. Today it is used as the means of communication by an increasing number of businesses. Frost & Sullivan estimates that there are over 3300 businesses in Europe that have deployed commercial telephony products that use some kind of ‘open source code’.<br /><br />The market is constantly being tapped by new players. Early entrants include ADDIX, Digium, ESCAUX, and Novacom who have generated quite a volume of business in the early years. New entrants in the market include players of different backgrounds such as<br />a) Community based vendors such as Fonality and PingTel<br />b) Channel partners of major PBX or IT/software vendors. There is a greater attraction amongst channel that deal with Linux.<br />c) Major PBX vendors such as 3Com, Aastra. It is known that Avaya and Nortel are building skills in this area as well.<br />d) Hardware vendors such as Dell, IBM and Sun<br />e) Carriers such as British Telecom<br /><br />The level of interest can be gauged by the number of free downloads of the base software. In 2007 alone, approximately 800,000 copies of Asterisk and TrixBox software were downloaded in Europe. Interestingly, overall in Europe an estimated 200,000 are still alive and are known to send heartbeat signals back to the community.<br /><br />Our market research indicates that deployments have been scattered in the sub 500 user segment. The largest deployment that we studied was of 850 users by Novacom, which we have developed into a case study in the report. The complexity that some of these vendors deal with span from simple call routing to support sophisticated call centre application. ADDIX, for instance, has been successful in deploying a number of call centre solutions in Germany.<br /><br />The total installed base of “open source” based systems in Europe is less than 1 percent of the market. There are numerous challenges that open source telephony vendors and channel partners need to overcome in order to be considered as a viable alternative in the market. A number of changes in the market dynamics favour the growth in momentum of open source telephony. The break-down of vertically-integrated industry structure is inline with the value proposition of “open source”. The ability to develop call processing software using open-source code running on off-the-shelf hardware and OS is expected to alter the telephony architecture in a number of organisations. Frost & Sullivan believes that with the right marketing strategy, ‘open source’ telephony will grow considerably.Enterprise Communicationhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02547627175373040405noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29647609.post-33545555152880414042008-04-18T12:42:00.000+00:002009-01-14T02:25:55.853+00:00Microsoft in Unified Communication<div>Recently I did a talk on Microsoft's position in the Unified Communication world at the iconic Wembley Stadium on the outskirts of London. I have attached a slide-deck of the presentation. </div><div><br /><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhP0YKVlzLU960ji1jZVxLm6Rj335G3cjGUVTWrZn_L7aVhKqhy0v2cY25zztBar4c8iiysVZCqjURMk66iaAXC-W6mdeAO_QFvEbC_GFY3V6IOhvMI8yiZqGFelDxOtqLlbjKSPg/s1600-h/Slide1.GIF"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5290967028648520690" style="WIDTH: 400px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 300px" alt="" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhP0YKVlzLU960ji1jZVxLm6Rj335G3cjGUVTWrZn_L7aVhKqhy0v2cY25zztBar4c8iiysVZCqjURMk66iaAXC-W6mdeAO_QFvEbC_GFY3V6IOhvMI8yiZqGFelDxOtqLlbjKSPg/s400/Slide1.GIF" border="0" /></a><br /></div><div><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgAhMTFjen9a5ZONwItqd_QYxmXDxSuMmWTw3ayilSd1sFUwJrt67ZT-YIlQ-vQ6MOlGDYCh6u6ebyV7PgeLX3znX-n0RFQzRELvYuDBDMaXt8WPdRxE03WZGLpqti3eOVnxriGgg/s1600-h/Slide2.GIF"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5290967129509142882" style="WIDTH: 400px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 300px" alt="" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgAhMTFjen9a5ZONwItqd_QYxmXDxSuMmWTw3ayilSd1sFUwJrt67ZT-YIlQ-vQ6MOlGDYCh6u6ebyV7PgeLX3znX-n0RFQzRELvYuDBDMaXt8WPdRxE03WZGLpqti3eOVnxriGgg/s400/Slide2.GIF" border="0" /></a></div><div><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiVnxDeoVSsnCrS4D0kIGhWwpA6KFcNe3UqiUmuLVPq2CrgTzY_02MSOAvAC-hbnRaQ2fkRN4gKttYzA_XlzDsnhtIyMNB8pdC-lE_I2uITvjjqYoj3N8O3XE1WQ79jALd8KSv9zg/s1600-h/Slide3.GIF"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5290967234049343554" style="WIDTH: 400px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 300px" alt="" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiVnxDeoVSsnCrS4D0kIGhWwpA6KFcNe3UqiUmuLVPq2CrgTzY_02MSOAvAC-hbnRaQ2fkRN4gKttYzA_XlzDsnhtIyMNB8pdC-lE_I2uITvjjqYoj3N8O3XE1WQ79jALd8KSv9zg/s400/Slide3.GIF" border="0" /></a></div><div></div><div><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhE1oEk7c4jYydo6mxmyi59LJqd3UCOQiHk5Sr391N9sdN6RU8V9g_FUzBqgPYwurASWA435hyphenhyphen4OnxDPf5LSQUinUr7JrJ5r1r3vIcF_Hd4Yi9f8JXTNMZjxW5ue0aY3Zij60Tu5w/s1600-h/Slide4.GIF"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5290967348030855778" style="WIDTH: 400px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 300px" alt="" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhE1oEk7c4jYydo6mxmyi59LJqd3UCOQiHk5Sr391N9sdN6RU8V9g_FUzBqgPYwurASWA435hyphenhyphen4OnxDPf5LSQUinUr7JrJ5r1r3vIcF_Hd4Yi9f8JXTNMZjxW5ue0aY3Zij60Tu5w/s400/Slide4.GIF" border="0" /></a></div><div></div><div><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjRmgnnv4nyoXkfymo9Lxo89htUTq2iVbyqIxqzntaLR2kPpQ-YO7ABJpNp6iwaYp0QSFTChN-1qG8peiG57U0wE-vI6EOzexr0z2FQLorh_ylmY-G3cREobOAZJQJ4OrJIYd6zLQ/s1600-h/Slide5.GIF"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5290967445432645330" style="WIDTH: 400px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 300px" alt="" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjRmgnnv4nyoXkfymo9Lxo89htUTq2iVbyqIxqzntaLR2kPpQ-YO7ABJpNp6iwaYp0QSFTChN-1qG8peiG57U0wE-vI6EOzexr0z2FQLorh_ylmY-G3cREobOAZJQJ4OrJIYd6zLQ/s400/Slide5.GIF" border="0" /></a></div><div></div><div><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi5AvMnEVbo1UZOzNdXymWIt4_PxGYlWyoXtfATuhuDyWZV3WR1dLTGPn0q5iiT-Bk9UVAboULecgUPtsu4NjJ2han3ehNNXE49_8V8vOpCn0OAg9PW0khzNu9E32TsyDM2Ve7wBA/s1600-h/Slide6.GIF"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5290967537847880354" style="WIDTH: 400px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 300px" alt="" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi5AvMnEVbo1UZOzNdXymWIt4_PxGYlWyoXtfATuhuDyWZV3WR1dLTGPn0q5iiT-Bk9UVAboULecgUPtsu4NjJ2han3ehNNXE49_8V8vOpCn0OAg9PW0khzNu9E32TsyDM2Ve7wBA/s400/Slide6.GIF" border="0" /></a></div>Enterprise Communicationhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02547627175373040405noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29647609.post-53990102649930165702008-02-13T00:02:00.000+00:002008-02-13T00:10:15.022+00:00Chart Focus: Vertical to Horizontal Transformation<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi4du2OAUezqeBHHoGk-F8jktfJsJIf44o2_llPc-246UgTDD5jyOJ5ibml_FNQZQhRC9TGHI2Bn9iBYIOri5ZltpQo9WCoiX5InODZbgPFTvIKLqODGzgeR3FJj4xTghfM2_fb9g/s1600-h/Picture3.jpg"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5166250361230523874" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; CURSOR: hand; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi4du2OAUezqeBHHoGk-F8jktfJsJIf44o2_llPc-246UgTDD5jyOJ5ibml_FNQZQhRC9TGHI2Bn9iBYIOri5ZltpQo9WCoiX5InODZbgPFTvIKLqODGzgeR3FJj4xTghfM2_fb9g/s400/Picture3.jpg" border="0" /></a><br /><div><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEimoOAAi7OSrOEwinFCp3SGmIflv2VA3PNU7mwFOuHCUweSG9pZeRq0RyqC3idDkXeETUwJs00Ayqcru05l06dHmssT2mzIWhDeTb0p07DsVk8Gwhy3jSJOqKRgG8kTbMEirWZefA/s1600-h/Picture1.jpg"></a><br /><br /><div></div></div>Enterprise Communicationhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02547627175373040405noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29647609.post-77744527524965886992008-01-12T21:23:00.000+00:002008-02-13T00:15:07.102+00:00Unified Messaging- vendor push or market pull?Over the past three months I have been researching this market in Europe as some of you know by now. I have spoken to a number of you in the meanwhile. It is amazing how similar the views are amongst people with similar firms and how different they appear from a different set of stakeholders. When I interact with vendors, all I hear is that the technology is mature, solutions well tested and sufficient knowledge base has been created. It is true that the delivery systems are more sophisticated now than before. The channel vouch for this. However the channel also suggest that sales are still hard to come by despite constantly rising numbers of license sales submitted by leading vendors.<br /><br />Before Christmas last year, I had interacted with a number of end users in sectors such as education, government, finance and banking. I was surprised by the relative lack of awareness amongst medium sized organisations. This constrasted with the savviness amongst IT folks of large organisations especially in banks and other financial institutions. These people not only knew what UM meant, some of them used the solution in their organisation. To confirm my fears, I surveyed my contact list (users) asking them if they used UM and if they did, how and where. I offered a very general definition of UM. Out of over 30 responses, only four (three of them work with vendors in the communication technology space while the fourth is with a channel organisation) suggested that my definition was not appropriate but rather very general. Yet except two of my respondents, none of the others use UM solutions at work.<br /><br />I am at the final stage of my investigation. I would very much appreciate your comments if any.Enterprise Communicationhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02547627175373040405noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29647609.post-79147585600323125622008-01-04T12:34:00.001+00:002008-01-04T12:40:53.818+00:00Executive Summary of European Wireless E-Mail MarketsLate last year, I researched the wireless e-mail markets in Europe. Many of you have helped me with your mails. As a note of thanks, I am reproducing a summary of the study. To access the complete report, please contact Nils Frenkel by writing to <a href="mailto:nils.frenkel@frost.com">nils.frenkel@frost.com</a><br /><br /><br />Wireless E-mail is one of the largest segments in the mobile enterprise application market. The installed base continues to grow as new customers deploy the solution and those with deployments expand their footprint. Transitioning from a ‘nice to have’ to ‘must have’ application, there is a growing market momentum among end-users to formulate mobility strategies centered on wireless e-mail. Organisations see a wider scope in the use of wireless e-mail technologies. The capability to push and pull data between mobile devices and the back-end servers creates new application areas for the technology. Surveys indicate that CIOs consider mobilising enterprise applications (especially e-mail) as one of their key priorities. However the value-chain for delivery and access continues to be plagued with serious challenges. Nonetheless optimism in the market suggests a steep growth opportunity in the number of business users.<br /><br />Research in Motion’s growth and its efforts in creating wider market awareness have led to a flurry of new entrants. There are several specialist vendors and niche players offering enterprise and consumer grade solutions. The key entities in the industry include the E-mail vendors, device manufacturers, mobile application platform suppliers and specialist players. E-mail vendors such as IBM Lotus, Novell GroupWise and Mirapoint look to follow Microsoft’s strategy to extend e-mail capabilities to wireless devices. Device manufacturers such as Nokia, Motorola and Samsung are investing to bring in new devices with the capabilities to support mobile applications such as wireless e-mail. A number of specialist vendors vie for growth opportunities in this lucrative segment. Several crucial stakeholders have taken measures to consolidate the industry. Acquisitions by Sybase (iAnywhere), Nokia (Intellisync) and Motorola (Good Technologies) are some cases in point. Specialist vendors and solution providers such as CommonTime, DMESync, Fenestrae, Funambol, LRW Digital, Notify Technology and OpenHand continue to play a crucial role in the market development. Mobile operators find themselves in an enviable position in this market. Several operators across Europe, such as Vodafone, T-Mobile, O2 and TIM now offer a breadth of solutions targeted to specific market segments. This is aided by the growth in white-labelled offers from vendors such as Consilient, CriticalPath, Funambol, Oz Communications, Seven, Synchronica and Visto, amongst several others.<br /><br />The success of Blackberry (BES and NOC services) and the entry of mobile operators in the market have created new opportunity in hosted wireless e-mail solutions especially in the SMB segment of the market. Currently several solution providers and some vendors offer this capability with the help of third-party operators. Several critical factors, including the maturity of the technology, early adopter acceptance, falling prices and affordable packages have helped wireless e-mail application become attractive to the SMB, SoHo and prosumer segment. However ‘behind the firewall’ deployments remain typical amongst enterprises.<br /><br />One of the reasons for wider market opportunity for this application is the marked change in our work pattern. As our professional lives are increasingly becoming integrated with our personal ones through the use of Internet technologies, our work life is changing. Growing trends of mobile workers, remote working and tele-working have placed out-of-office connectivity as a top priority. The relative pervasiveness of e-mail (except when compared with telephony) makes it crucial for CIOs to match its availability with changing work patterns. Remaining connected at affordable prices and using corporate resources remotely to make intelligent decisions not only improves performance effectiveness, but also leads to competitive differentiation.<br /><br />Despite such attractiveness CIOs find it prudent to delay implementation decisions in the face of severe challenges. Scalability, unpredictability of operating costs, device & application security, device management, lack of standardisation, future-proofing and limited scope of interoperability in the value chain create road blocks to deployment.<br /><br />Frost & Sullivan believes that the industry will work towards overcoming these challenges, making investment in wireless e-mail more attractive. We expect to see increased efforts towards standardisation and interoperability. We forecast a strong growth of corporate wireless e-mail users from an installed base of 8.4 million in 2006 to 85.8 million in 2012 in Europe.Enterprise Communicationhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02547627175373040405noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29647609.post-73684215671835243632008-01-04T12:13:00.000+00:002008-01-04T12:18:25.046+00:00Market Slowdown?First few days into the New Year, I am reviewing some of the macro-economic numbers that came in towards the end of 2007. Preliminary analysis indicate a slowdown in procurement this year in Europe. I would like to invite my readers to mail me what you think 2008 has in store for us.Enterprise Communicationhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02547627175373040405noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29647609.post-8478940773695473672008-01-01T13:17:00.000+00:002008-01-01T13:32:17.495+00:00Summary of events in 2007 and Outlook for 2008New Year Greetings!<br /><br />I am aware of my irregularity in adding posts over the past two months. It is amazing how much time it can take up to maintain and update a blog. In the New Year, I'll try to improve on my track record. Let me start off my reproducing the article I wrote for CommBusiness which will also be available on frost.com in a few weeks.<br /><br />Stepping into New Year, let’s look back at the European enterprise telephony industry in 2007 and review the major announcements that will affect 2008. <br /><br /><strong>Key Announcements in 2007 and their relevance in 2008 and beyond</strong><br /><br />1) Microsoft releases its Unified Communication portfolio<br /><br />The launch of Office Communication Server 2007 (OCS) and Office Communicator 2007 (MOC) has been one of the most high-profile announcements in the Unified Communication marketplace. This heralded Microsoft’s entry into the industry that has been dominated by PBX and switch manufacturers. In addition to Microsoft, close rival IBM has developed strategic interests in this market. The entry of these software powerhouses will play a strategic role in shaping the future of Unified Communication in the years to come.<br /><br />2) Avaya goes private, Mitel acquires Inter-tel and NEC acquires the assets of Sphere<br /><br />One of the leading companies in the enterprise communication technology industry, Avaya agreed to become a privately owned entity. This move led to concerns amongst a section of the market. User organisations who contend this to be a sign of further consolidation were fearful of the investments. Generally, buying organisations procure enterprise communication infrastructure with a long term view. Industry consolidation creates uncomfortable questions on the future of product lines and the validity of existing agreements. Despite these concerns, the industry witnessed consolidation amongst players that cater to the SMB and mid-market segments. Mitel acquired Inter-Tel to become the leading vendor in the SMB segment in North America. NEC acquired all assets of Sphere.<br /><br />While the industry consolidated, new players continued to enter the market bringing with them innovative products based on cutting edge technologies. These effects of consolidation and innovation are set to play crucial roles in infrastructure/application procurement decision making amongst buyer organisations in 2008.<br /><br />3) Leading vendors acquire strategic assets in the ‘Software as a Service’ space<br /><br />Signalling changing times, leading ‘on-premise’ vendors acquired strategic assets in the ‘Software as a Service’ space. Microsoft acquired TellMe, Cisco acquired WebEx and IBM acquired WebDialogs to set them on par with changing times.<br /><br />These market moves indicate that these players spot growth opportunities in the ‘SaaS’ space especially after the success of players such as salesforce.com and the growing clout of Google (GoogleApps). This makes sense as competition and innovation continue to erode the precious gross-margins in a market that is increasingly looking to share the risks with its suppliers.<br /><br />4) New products continue to enter the market<br /><br />Over the span of 2007, the market has been regularly greeted with new product announcements. This is reflective of the perceived growth opportunity. Alcatel-Lucent, Cisco, Panasonic, Samsung, Siemens Enterprise, and Toshiba BCD amongst others launched new products. Others released new versions of their successful products.<br /><br />Alcatel-Lucent renewed its focus in the 100-500 user segment with the release of Business Integrated Communication Solution (BiCS). This launch fills the long standing gap in the vendor’s portfolio. Targeting the same segment, Cisco announced the launch of Cisco Unified Communication Manager Business Edition that will cater to the 150-500 user segment.<br /><br />There were a number of new products released in 2007, majority in the sub 50-extension segment. Cisco launched Unified Communication 500 series that can scale to 48 users. Siemens Enterprise announced HiPath OpenOffice ME, to be released in January 2008. The IP based UC toolset is designed to not only cater to the 20-50 user segment, but scales up to support 150 user enterprises. Panasonic’s launch of KXTDE marked its entry into the IP world. The traditional vendors in the SMB space weren’t to be left behind. Toshiba BCD launched Strata CIX40 while Samsung released OfficeServ 7100. Besides them, Microsoft released its UC portfolio that we have discussed earlier.<br /><br />At a glance these announcements reveal an interesting point. Almost all target the sub-500 segment. This is inline with market results published by Industry Analysts. One recent report released in December 2007 claims a decline in the growth in the mid and enterprise market segments, while the SMB segment in the U.K is reported to have grown by 20 percent in Q4, 2007. <br /><br />Based on the developments on the supplier’s side and analysis of market demand in 2007, the following trends will shape 2008.<br /><br /><strong>Market Trends in 2008<br /></strong><br />A) PBX is passé, ‘UC’ is the buzzterm<br /><br />Unified Communication (UC) has certainly become a very popular term in the industry especially since Microsoft began its marketing. Its importance amongst the vendors can be felt by the fact that Microsoft, Cisco and Avaya have created business units to cater to this market. Most vendors in the enterprise telephony and indeed the communication software industry have developed UC portfolios.<br /><br />Cisco re-branded its flagship Call Manager (IP PBX) as a Unified Communication Manager. Its UC portfolio includes IP telephony, messaging and collaboration products. Alcatel-Lucent on the other hand has bundled its applications into a suite, called OmniTouch Unified Communication. Avaya’s UC portfolio is similar to Cisco’s. The portfolio includes products from IP telephony, messaging, conferencing & collaboration and enterprise mobility families. Siemens Enterprise employs a different strategy. Its UC portfolio includes HiPath Openscape, a portal that offers presence enabled collaboration.<br /><br />Besides enterprise telephony suppliers, software vendors such as Microsoft and IBM amongst others offer a suite of products under the UC banner. Others such as Oracle and SAP are all also set to join the party. Infrastructure players such as Tandberg and Polycom don’t want to be left behind either. These vendors have developed their own UC portfolio focussing on their strengths.<br /><br />Overall the UC industry is an amalgamation of different communication technology and application silos. It will be the buyers who will help shape the market in terms of sourcing decisions in the years to come.<br /> <br />B) The Focus Market for Enterprise Telephony is Shifting to SMB<br /><br />In the previous segment, we discussed the growing importance of SMB. In 2007, a number of players have developed new initiatives to foster channel presence in the SMB segment. Nortel created channel marketing bureau to deepen its presence in the SMB and mid-market. Siemens launched its global partner program- Go Forward! As part of that, there is news that Siemens Enterprise will be investing around € 4 million in U.K, a major part of which will be invested in the development of channel to carry their OpenOffice product. Cisco’s new channel initiative in the SMB space is called the Cisco Industry Solutions Partners Network. ShoreTel, another emerging player in the SMB has been extending its partner network for sometime now.<br /><br />C) Enterprise Mobility is ‘Hot’<br /><br />Industry Analyst reports suggest very high growth rates for mobile enterprise applications. A Frost & Sullivan study forecasts CAGR of over 20 percent for wireless e-mail and mobile CRM over the period of 2008-2013. It is only natural that enterprise telephony vendors will aim to get a piece of that action.<br /><br />Several players such as Aastra Technologies, Alcatel-Lucent, Avaya, Cisco, Ericsson, Mitel, Nortel, Siemens amongst others have a breadth of solutions in this space. A number of players such as Ericsson and ShoreTel amongst others have been marketing Mobile Unified Communications. As buying organisations develop mobility strategies, we can expect to see an increase in activity in the times ahead.<br /><br /><br />D) Collaboration Gains Fresh Impetus<br /><br />The growing mindshare for Web 2.0 innovations have given a fresh impetus to the need for collaboration software within organisations. Surveys indicate that a majority of business managers believe in the value of Enterprise 2.0 type collaboration tools and software.<br /><br />Although there aren’t many stories on deployments yet, the strength in the buzz appears to have the potential to create a market. However there are concerns that some of the claims made are over-rated and the entire hype will fizzle out.<br /><br />E) SOA and Web Services Gain Traction<br /><br />Downward price pressure on hardware and the renewed focus on software and services has brought to fore the opportunities for SOA and web services. Most leading infrastructure vendors including Cisco, HP amongst others have been promoting the idea of SOA.<br />The current replacement cycle is an ideal ground to sow the seeds of SOA. The market moves by leading players such as Cisco, Microsoft, IBM, SAP and Oracle suggest that there will be stronger emphasis on web services.<br /><br />F) Open Source and Open System Gain Mindshare<br /><br />There has been a number of marked changes in the architecture and technology of IP telephony systems. There is an increasing acceptance of third-party components such as server and media-gateways. While a number of vendors continue to harden the servers, the momentum is towards the use of standard off-the-shelf components.<br /><br />Since 2004, Linux has replaced Windows in most of the new products rolled out in the market. This, along with the growth of Asterisk (now used by Digium, Aastra technologies and 3Com), marks the ascent of open-source in call control systems of enterprise telecommunication. Apart from NEC United and Nortel (except CS2100) most tier-1 vendors’ flagship products run on open source OS, with Linux ranking highest on choice.<br /><br />Industry standards such as SIP and SOA are getting embed in their core system design. Offerings from leading vendors such as Alcatel OmniPCX Enterprise, Avaya Communications Manager, Cisco Unified Call Manager, Ericsson MX-ONE, Mitel 3300 ICP and Nortel Succession series were made SIP capable. Several products including Siemens IP portfolio including Hipath 2000, 5000 and 8000, 3Com VCX7000 and InterTel 7000 were designed on SIP from scratch. All new products introduced in 2007 were SIP based.<br /><br />The events in 2007 and the trends evolving as a result promise to make 2008 an exciting year for all of us!Enterprise Communicationhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02547627175373040405noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29647609.post-73180445381348263512007-11-16T20:41:00.002+00:002009-01-14T02:54:46.827+00:00I like Blackberry CurveI had promised the AR team at RIM that I will write about my experience with Blackberry. First, I have to admit that I am no crazy about gadgets. The last device I had before my blackberry was a Nokia 6000 series basic phone, which I left with my parents since I got the blackberry.<br /><br />When I first got the blackberry, a first look made me like it. It is of the right size-neither too long nor too short for the keypad. It fit my pocket. The device is light and I loved the look.<br /><br />Our MIS at Frost & Sullivan took a day to set things up and then I realised what I had got into. I was getting my office mails on my phone. wow! This was incredible. However, it didn't take a week for the reaction to transform from wow! to jeez! Now I was working on the train, between meetings, almost everywhere. I could be reached by e-mail and phone anytime anywhere unless I switched my phone off. Inevitablely, I was working harder and smarter. My response time has increased significantly. This blackberry is a power tool.<br /><br />The best part of the experience is certainly the e-mail and qwerty keyboard. Together they just do it for me. Not seen anything better yet.<br /><br />The blackberry curve that I have does almost everything for me. The other day I was travelling and didnot have a place to connect my laptop to the Internet. Phew! who needs a laptop unless one is using office applications and specialised software. Blackberry devices don't support native downloading and editing of office files unlike Palm and Windows Mobile which does. However, it is true that presentations do open on the curve, but one can hardly read what is written even after full zoom.<br /><br />Integration of calender with my office system is just brilliant. However I am not sure why I don't get reminders. Nonetheless, what I can do now with this device is no less feat.<br /><br />On the phone side of things, the experience isn't that great. The number of features clearly don't compare anywhere near the office phone (it isn't supposed to, yet!), it doesn't compare very favourably against what other phones can do. Especially around the conferencing and call wait side of things. However, what sets Blackberry apart is the fact that it supports Wi-Fi. Can you think of the potential when you can make VoIP calls at flat data rates.<br /><br />The IM tool is just awesome. Blackberry Curve supports Yahoo!, ICQ, AOL, Windows Live, Google Talk and Blackberry Messenger. The best part of this capability is the ability to log-in to multiple IMs and toggle across them. One is notified when a new message is received. The engineers have been just great with this. <br /><br />Having used it for four months, I must admit business life without it would seem a bit dull. Great job RIM. Hats off to the engineers..........Enterprise Communicationhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02547627175373040405noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29647609.post-79833778770155269122007-11-01T17:02:00.000+00:002007-11-01T17:18:12.921+00:00Complete communication without distractionYes, thats the phrase I got from the VP of a Bank in the U.S. He stressed that all different technologies are good in their own right. Examples: Telephone solves the need to have face to face communication. IM solves the need to phone to have a quick word. Video conferencing solves the need to travel (similar to face to face communication). Mobile phones allows telephone conversation while 'on the move'. All these are great tools. However left on their own, they can be bothersome in a work environment. Hardly does one not get distracted these days by these tools. How often have we not been distracted by a telephone/mobile phone ring or an IM pop.<br /><br />The VP of a Bank says, "what is needed is a housing system that can offer a complete communication experience without the menace of distraction". Is he suggesting 'Unified Communication'? I don't know if UC can solve the issue of distraction. I heard Gurdeep Singh Pall from Microsoft suggest, that in the future, a telephone call without a subject line will be considered rude. Interesting and futuristic. I asked a few IT/Telecom Managers what they thought and guess what? They thought I am going 'nuts'.<br /><br />Is it possible to imagine a world where we are contacted only when we need to be, that is distracted with reason?Enterprise Communicationhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02547627175373040405noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29647609.post-36381169801306474942007-10-26T01:24:00.000+00:002007-10-28T17:56:25.852+00:00Exchange UM vs Call PilotSometimes I wonder how business decisions are made! One of those that baffle me is the choice between Call Pilot and Exchange UM. A little background on this - Nortel and Microsoft announced an alliance in July 0f 2006 agreeing amongst other things to do joint R&D and synergise their go-to-market program in the area of UC. Nortel has a very strong background in the areas of telephony, contact centre, messaging (including Unified Messaging, a market where Frost & Sullivan ranks them second in North America). Microsoft on the other hand has very high market share in e-mail and collaboration space. One of the areas of product overlaps for the Microsoft-Nortel alliance is Unified Messaging. Nortel's offer, the CallPilot has been in the market for at least 10 years. I know, one of my peers used CallPilot in his lab way back in 1997. Microsoft on the other hand introduced Unified Messaging capabilities in Exchange 2007.<br /><br />Unified Messaging seems to have never taken off as expected. In these years, the industry evolved to offer Unified Communications with very little installed base on Unified Messaging. So, despite the long history and relative product maturity, CallPilot and its product peers didn't create the adoption curve, the markeeters so hoped to achieve. On the other hand, UM in Exchange 2007 seems to have caught the fancy of many. In the numerous discussions that I have had in recent months with user organisations and channel, there is a unanimous voice to try and test UM within Exchange. That said, the numbers are far lower than what CallPilot commands. Now I am sure if I had spoken to the market when CallPilot was launched, I might have encountered similar euphemism. So when I hear the buzz in the industry suggesting Nortel might reduce R&D activities on CallPilot, I wonder how such decisions are made!Enterprise Communicationhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02547627175373040405noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29647609.post-37042152486799259052007-10-26T00:58:00.000+00:002007-10-28T17:57:00.023+00:00Unified Messaging and Microsoft ExchangeIf you talk to people who have been part of the Unified Messaging (UM) evolution, you may notice a taste of bitterness towards Microsoft. The Redmond based company introduced Unified Messaging in their Microsoft Exchange 2007. This development comes almost 10 years into the life of UM. Yet all you hear in the market these days is Microsoft Exchange UM.<br /><br />A few weeks ago, I was asked if there was any traction for Microsoft's UM in the market and how it affected competition. Based on my discussions with user organisations and having seen some fresh shipment figures of the main players, I could say with some confidence that I didn't see any effect on competition. To the question on traction, I begged for time.<br /><br />Since then I spoke with a number of people in the channel community across the world. Plus I interacted with a number of user organisations. For instance, the other day the IT Director of a borough in England clearly indicated that he will be considering UM once he installs Exchange 2007. I met up with a country manager of a software vendor who said that a growing number of his clients are talking about UM in conjunction to Exchange 2007.<br /><br />This begs a question--what is it about Microsoft UM that leads to such a traction compared to competition's products that has been in the market for over 10 years? I can offer you my thoughts but first let me find out what you think.Enterprise Communicationhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02547627175373040405noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29647609.post-69243429163524900552007-10-16T23:17:00.000+00:002007-10-17T06:14:07.680+00:00Challenges for Microsoft in the UC worldMicrosoft released a number of UC products with a lot of fanfare in SanFrancisco. It was great to watch Bill Gates deliver the keynote. As always he offered a great vision; this time for office communication.<br /><br />Microsoft released a few products today that include Office Communication Server 2007, Microsoft Office Communicator 2007, Microsoft RoundTable, Microsoft Exchange Server 2007 (new release), Live Meeting 7.<br /><br />You may view the webcast <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/uc/default.mspx">http://www.microsoft.com/uc/default.mspx</a> to get a grip of what they are saying if you haven't already done so. In this post I am going to focus on the challenges ahead for Microsoft UCG.<br /><br />Challenge 1- <strong>Negotiating the installed communication technologies: </strong>The communication technology market (enterprise telephony; conferencing including audio, video and web; collaboration) are mature. In some cases (ex: enterprise telephony) the solutions are pervasive.<br /><br />Microsoft has taken a bold approach that it will build a new communication paradigm. Its newly released products won't work with almost any PBX (probably except Nortel CS1000 perhaps), conferencing equipments, or phones that are already deployed. To address this, they are build a industry partner ecosystem. For example- In the PBX world, Nortel is developing a out-of-box integration capability with OCS. Similarly Ericsson has a mobility server in mind and Mitel is releasing a communication server built around OCS for the SMB.<br /><br />Challenge 2- <strong>Unleashing the full set of capabilities: </strong>What Microsoft can offer in ideal conditions is no doubt powerful and very useful. There is no doubt in my mind that it offers significant advantages over present technologies. However to be able to enjoy the capabilities, users must not only deploy Microsoft UC products but also integrate them with their installed base. At this point in time this is a near impossibility. The success for Microsoft and the user depends on whether the users decides to replace their 'sunk-in investments' in favour of Microsoft certified products.<br /><br />The assumption that users will deploy 'Microsoft or Microsoft certified products everywhere' is like a dream that every man on earth will one day walk on the moon. Nonetheless there will be deployments in pockets. Users will buy parts of the technology to fill gaps. However, they will resist discussions of replacements unless they are sweetened enough.Enterprise Communicationhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02547627175373040405noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29647609.post-65081221294227088102007-10-14T21:00:00.000+00:002007-10-17T05:37:41.052+00:00Forum Discussion- Unified Messaging: Buying BehaviorDear Readers,<br /><br />Apologies for not updating this space for over a month. It has been a crazy time. I am meaning to become regular again. You can help me by participating in this discussion. I am working on a report on the Unified Messaging market for which I am looking to tap into your insights. For starters, what has been your experience with Unified Messaging? If you have not yet deployed then why not?<br /><br />Lets get this started. Please write-in your perspetives in the comments section.<br /><br />Cheers,<br />ShomikEnterprise Communicationhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02547627175373040405noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29647609.post-60522232107908738272007-08-23T12:14:00.000+00:002007-08-23T13:48:41.495+00:00Software titans march continuesI am referring to IBM and Microsoft. Both announced a roadmap for their UC portfolio. IBM's Lotus Sametime Unified Telephony is expected to be GA by mid 2008. This launch will be preceded by the release of Lotus Sametime "Standard" in Q4, 2007, Lotus Sametime "Entry" 8.0 and Lotus Sametime "Advanced" 8.0 in Q1, 2008.<br /><br /><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi1eBld2tP9jjcbcJaWsSye7Vj2JPoVvAJUavWjvFAJPQSmHoZuelJ8WTVRrSBJRAkRVhjvgcikIgvBddeutSPbfKItvPMCp4MlJBt0bSPwPBjyw9Bzzg5MUowl0KHH3zy23LKvAQ/s1600-h/IBM1.gif"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5101872816092531442" style="FLOAT: right; MARGIN: 0px 0px 10px 10px; CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi1eBld2tP9jjcbcJaWsSye7Vj2JPoVvAJUavWjvFAJPQSmHoZuelJ8WTVRrSBJRAkRVhjvgcikIgvBddeutSPbfKItvPMCp4MlJBt0bSPwPBjyw9Bzzg5MUowl0KHH3zy23LKvAQ/s400/IBM1.gif" border="0" /></a>IBM's unified communication strategy is centred on its sametime offering. It aims to tie-in all elements of communication and collaboration to its sametime offer which is expected to evolve to support unified telephony. IBM signed a OEM agreement with Siemens Enterprise Communication to license elements of Siemens' Openscape.<br /><br />Siemens has been one of the early adopters of open communication. Support for standards-based communication facilitating interoperability has been the cornerstone of its OpenPath mantra. Maintaining the central elements of its vision, Siemens has consistently believed in open communication since 'LifeWorks' was coined. In fact, their Openscape is probably one of the best fully-baked unified communication portals available in the market today.<br /><br /><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjcvfKhfkQLEMHRzkwCQ0gx8hy-Dc9SqAkB9RGLTylywXvwR-7N8OjecR_HclfqSwNa4f8Us17NHqcdM_DPe70mlEU-ShU9tubUj30fywVNxQa2T9jACKLPfaZRl_2a8-jPvwf90A/s1600-h/siem.gif"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5101891280156936962" style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 10px 10px 0px; CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjcvfKhfkQLEMHRzkwCQ0gx8hy-Dc9SqAkB9RGLTylywXvwR-7N8OjecR_HclfqSwNa4f8Us17NHqcdM_DPe70mlEU-ShU9tubUj30fywVNxQa2T9jACKLPfaZRl_2a8-jPvwf90A/s400/siem.gif" border="0" /></a><br />Siemens had a very engaging relationship with Microsoft. Way back in 2005, Siemens had launched HiPath openscape telephony control link (TCL), a separate server that sits between LCS and PBX (supports Alcatel, Avaya, Cisco, Nortel in addition to Siemens) to facilitate exchange of presence and notification across platforms. Their relationship suffered since Microsoft formed an alliance (ICA) with Nortel. ICA recently celebrated its first anniversary. It is believed that they have sold in excess of 500,000 licenses (Nortel telephony licenses and LCS CALs) in their first year. ICA product portfolio is expected to be strengthened by the general availability of OCS/MOC.<br /><br />Microsoft announced the 'release to manufacturing' of OCS/MOC and Round Table on July 26th. Eric Swift, Senior Director, Unified Communication Group at Microsoft said that OCS/MOC is due to be available from Oct 16th 2007. The price list will be made available on September 1. He said that Live Meeting 7 will be released this fall. Microsoft Exchange 2007 SP1 beta is released. At a keynote at VoiceCon, Gurdeep Singh Pall announced Quality of Experience monitoring server, a product developed by <a href="http://www.psytechnics.com/page.php?id=home">Psytechnics</a>. He announced the licensing of Microsoft's RT audio codec about which I have commented in a previous post.<br /><br />Microsoft's UCG seems confident of OCS/MOC. It has built a strong ecosystem, its alliance with Nortel is delivering results. Recent <a href="http://newsroom.cisco.com//dlls/2007/eKits/Competitive_Partnership_Principles.pdf?Referring_site=Matterhorn2007PressKit&Position=OtherResources2">agreement of cooperation </a>with Cisco is a great step towards creating a traction in the communication technology space. In the past one year, Microsoft has taken concrete steps to shape themselves as a player in the voice market.Enterprise Communicationhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02547627175373040405noreply@blogger.com0